Action, not mere words needed

  
What started as a simple phone call by me in January 2007 to Bell tech help line to determine why my internet services were so slow and sluggish next had  become a major farce, cover-up on the part of Bell Sympatico. I was next lied to for months as to the real reasons Bell they rather had offered me their poor internet services to me and  to many others in my city for years now too.. and then Bell had even  lied to me some more, had also breached their contractual obligations to me many times too, had allowed me even to be slandered, abused on the Bell customer forums now too.. and why? so  that clearly greedy Bell can continue stay in business to make more money..
 
and so who really cares now about the customer’s good welfare in reality? now? What not Bell itself, not the CRTC, not the federal government, not our Prime Minister Stephen Harper, not  the the federal Minister of Consumer Affairs, Jim Prentice..  not  any provincial consumer affairs Minister, but only the citizens, the news media, and the NDP party care about the citizens  good welfare really it seems. Not acceptable for sure too!
 “If you were half as good at running a company as you were at lobbying, maybe you’d have a better network,”  Quebecor executive vice-president Luc Lavoie who took a shot at the quality of Bell Canada’s cellphone service: . http://news.aol.ca/article/telecom-summit/258999/
   
 The future is wireless, some would say  and the  past way they have mismanaged their past land line, ISP services too,  clearly indicates they will do it also next with the wireless services too at the users, customers expenses…
  
Recent discussions by both Bell and Rogers on their Corporate need  to get more and more money, with even any excuse, still out of consumers, and to throttle the downloads,  only all clearly confirms the reality as to how poorly managed these same companies in reality are still.. They too now have been wrongfully over subsidized by the CRTC, the Canadian  federal governments now too… now it is rather time the citizens got the break, protection.
   
Reality- Dirty Dirty Bell Sympatico …the most abusive Corporation, firm I have dealt in Canada in my lifetime. Paul Kambulow
 
 Not acceptable, and Comments are not  needed  FOR THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH..

 

 
From:  pk
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545
 
..now clearly useless LuvieDuvie:  thank you for your opinion but who had now made you the God, judge and jury of me now.. the devil?   judge me not and you will be not judged yourself.. firstly also take the big beam out of your own eyes and then you can help the others a lot better too..  for people like you who try to suck up to Bell rather still do not  help the matters for anyone.. for now Bell really rightfully needs a serious rod and not a carrot..
 
Me I had rightfully  witnessed how dirty Bell really is and I did something good about it.. I too had helped to exposé them to all for what they are really like  and rightfully too worldwide.. I told them what I was doing and why too beforehand even. Yes I do not show partiality to anyone bad cops, bad politicians, bad managers, bad pastors, bad corporations too and  I have been exposing them the last 3 decades.. for someone has to do it too.
 
I have been working with the News media, the press the last 25 years, and for a decade now too I daily write my views to all the major Newspapers, mostly in Canada, and they do next often act upon it as well. I also post my own comments on politics now too.  http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday6  http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/  The news media plays a vital role in our society, it tends to be the voice, the conscience of the majority of the people, citizens..  Yes I also do even complain about news reporters lies, spins, distortions but fortunately they have their free speech and so do many others too now, me included.. at least most of the time.. I have had the police wrongfully come to my home 6 times in my life time in Canada cause some politician did not like that I had sent him a letter with a copy to the news editors, including a prime minister, premier, mayor now too.. and I am still writing, and most of the bad guys I wrote about are out of office  sooner or later. For the news media tends not to support the losers once exposed even by me.. and no politician can win without the news media support, for advertising is very costly as even Mrs. Clinton or the  PM Stephen Harper knows. Bell relies on their adds, not the past satisfied customers for it’s business mostly still too.
 
Have a nice day Paul
 

Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:58 PM
To: PK
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545
 
Dear paul kambulow,  The thread “The Paul Kambulow Topic” in the forum titled “Miscellaneous” has received the following reply from LuvieDuvie: 

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic 

‘I want the whole world to see what they are really out and to have BELL GO OUT OF BUSINESS.. THAT SHOULD BE CLEAR EVEN TO YOU from THE START of my post on Bell’s site’ 

Well if your venomous motives wern’t clear before, you certainly made them clear now. 

Thanks, Have a nice day

From: PK
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:39 PM
To: Sympatico Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic :::m=10675958:p=10146545

 Like I wrote elsewhere here too

 I merely have substantiated here how many others now do also like me feel about Bell’s secrecy, under handiness, definite internet contract violations, lies… I support my side of the truth, story too.

I am not alone who complains to Bell often and loud.

and still what surprises me is that Bell wrongfully thought it could get away with al of their bad acts to me and others in the first place..

Me I have the decency to first complain to Bell, to tell them honestly, openly what I am going to post on my site next about them too, at least they were pre-warned by me.
but firstly you did notice that no one from Bell has send me a copy of my last six months billing or proof I had requested any contract changes, new equipment as well, and no one had phoned me back this week from Bell again now too.. now why was that? They had lied and had promised they would.

So it is no wonder so many people today are really rightfully upset at Bell, not just me.

Getting me more upset is the wrong thing for Bell to try to do, I just get louder, do write thousands more letters to news editors, electric officials still too..

They Bell should by now know I too can escalate the matters and not back down.. Bell still does needs to adequately deal with me, reply to me before it gets worse for them and they lose thousands more customers..
Beyond the shadow of the doubt the articles posted here by me showed that Bell ‘so capping reasons were false, unsubstantiated, and so I still rightfully object to Bell capping my net to all too.
I paid Bell for unlisted, unlimited download and they did not supply it to me, Bell did not even have the honestly to originally tell the truth to all and to beforehand say that they were capping it now as well.. Bell they done it first in secret, and were thus wrongfully violating my personal privacy in the process too.
Talking about Bell’s balance reply Bell they have only one reply basically and It is take it or leave it.. I have another.. I rightfully object!

but me I also do fight back and let the whole world know how the snakes in the dark operate in the darkness, and the darkness hates the light to be revealed upon it still too
Bell loses many many customers now too as a result of these exposures of how Bell operates.
Even my neighbors when they read the newspaper can see the positive influence that I have had on the elected officials, news media in regard to Bell’s undeniable bad services, bad acts and my neighbours they all agree with me on this too… I am doing a good thing exposing Bell.

In fact NDP Party did not make a public comment till I asked how come? and they immediately spoke out against Bell now too.
Have a nice day
Paul
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/

Bell should not fight with someone retired like me, for I have plenty of free time , and a desire to pursue it with everyone even more next too, and it will be costly for Bell too.
I told them beforehand in writing the war with Bell will escalate NEXT TOO and it did, it has, they have a lot more to lose

From: PK
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:21 AM
Subject: They still do like to lie, distort and bash me, others on Bell Sympatico customer forum and Bell, the Bell administrator falsely allows it to.. but Bell does not allow anyone to loudly complain about Bell, the immoral hypocrites
They often do  like to lie, distort, slander  and bash me, others on the Bell Sympatico customer forum and  Bell,  plus the  Bell administrator also now falsely allows it to.. While I use my real name, the main poster use an alias to disguise they are likely related to Bell’s executive Care Sasha Rollins..  http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/action/forums/displaypost?postID=10146557  It does Remind  me of the new Conservatives too. They can’t help showing to all what they are still really like, liars, bad persons..

Posted Apr 28, 2008 by LuvieDuvie
Well at least I (we) now know the reasons why Bell apperantly told him they would terminate his internet service…. can’t say I blame then now.

P: I don’t think you are gaining any allies as your abuse in, and of, this forum continues… Posted 12:02 AM by paul kambulow
OutStart Participate>>”Dear Client, Thank you for choosing Bell Sympatico Online Client Care. We have received your email and one of our representatives will reply to
you. A response will be sent to you within the next 24 to 48 hours. Your reference number for this email is 7720253.”  

I guess Birds of feathers flock together and thus maybe you are just as big a liar as Bell mostly still is for you cannot substantiate that Bell has said they would terminate my internet contract with Bell for in reality their rather bad internet services, for rather Bell has has even lately in writing now said to me that BELL STILL WANTS TO CONTINUE DOING BUSINESS WITH ME. SIGNED SASHA ROLLINS BELL EXECUTIVE CARE.
Thank you for your post anyway for it still gives me my free speech opportunity to write to all more about Big Bad Bell Sympatico, and how Bad Bell’s EXECUTIVE CARE SASHA ROLLINS AND HIS SUPERVISOR were, ARE IN BADLY INVOLVED IN ALL OF THIS abuse of me by BELL AGAIN TOO. Sasha has not denied my claim TO HIM IN WRITING TOO now of him likely being an accomplice Bell falsely by fraud tying to get me and many other BELL CUSTOMER’S of from our unlimited contract as some BELL’S SUBORDINATES had promised in January apparently to Bell’s Board of directors. YES I HAD OFTEN DETAILED BELLS MANY UNDENIABLE WRONG DOINGS WORLD WIDE IN WRITING TO ALL MANY TIMES even as to why they now are so Bad , for even the undeniable witness, public record. If Bell was not in the wrong do you now think they would have let all of my Bell writings drag on this long? of course not.. very revealing ehh?

Did you even now really think that I was writing here now at all to get any kind of support from anyone here, then you are still dreaming, and/or what you think this is some kind of election platform? popularity contest? Note Rather by fairness , by requirement of the law itself, I do have the duty to first present my complaints in writing to Bell Sympatico, to also detail my complaints to them, and also next to give them a chance to rectify them now, even before the matter can even be escalated to any of the courts, consumer affairs ministers, news media next too. This I have done. Thus had you read my posts here you could have noticed that I was just keeping this requirement of the law here too before the matter here too obviously has to be taken to court, by even Bell firstly now if they want to get paid, for they have already in writing admitted to me that I have pre charged them firstly with breach of contract, unethical, unprofessional behavior , harassment , obstruction of justice, fairness too, and many times in writing now, and Bell has, have not even denied it back to me and next they cannot by law, it is too late..
And so next I am rightfully now asking them to pay a compensation to me, and any others for all of this abuse now  too. I even have now specified the rightfully fair compensation demand from me for the whole world to know and read, at 1000 dollars and one year free high speed unlimited internet for their past false misleading adverting, poor services   to me, and for their undeniably not keeping now 3 past contractual agreements with me even those of August 2007, December 2007 too.
 
 Next this year  there were those lying crooks at Bell who to get a commission had definitely committed fraud / forgery and said I had requested from them both an  internet and equipment upgrade on my account, with no substantiation now to prove it too, even  like you,  and  I have reported this to the RCMP and asked them to deal with it too, and Bell has not even denied any of I toot, because Bell Sympatico Billing had confirmed these facts already this month  to me,  and gave me one of their names too, and so  I asked Bell to also prosecute those bad Bell people too still.  Why you think it was accidently that Bell had wrongfully refused to give me an official copy signed too, in writing the last four months Billing statement?  the direct proof of this fraud so I can likely also  present it too the judges formally too? Not so? Dream on..  for the reality bites ehh?
 
And what you do not think that many people who had, have read all these facts already, even  posted on over 30 different internet sites for months now too, posts read by hundreds of thousands of people world wide, that  next Bell has not lost many customers as a result too? Dream on!
 
but do have a nice day, Thanks for the post
Paul
http://thenonconformer.blogspot.com/
 
What you can do : Complain  for a start to CRTC »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/welcome.htm ,
Competition Bureau »www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/epic···/en/Home ,   
     

Complain to the News media
the Local MP’s, the premiers of all provinces:

http://thenonconformer.tripod.com/index.html

 

 

Advertisements

Prime Minister Harper

 
Canada: The Lying Minister of Democratic Reform   Written by Press Release     Saturday, 26 April 2008  Democracy Watch
  
Today, Democracy Watch sent a letter to federal Conservative House Leader and Minister for Democratic Reform Peter Van Loan demanding that he apologize for lying last Wednesday, April 16th in the House of Commons about Democracy Watch’s position concerning the Conservatives’ TV advertising spending scheme during the 2006 federal election.
 
In response to a question in the House of Commons on April 16th, Mr. Van Loan stated: “In terms of our spending practices, I would like to quote Duff Conacher of Democracy Watch, who was on CTV today. He said, “The Conservatives did something in the last election that all parties have done for years. That’s legal, and parties can donate as much as they want to a local candidate and often do to candidates that don’t have a lot of local support and can’t raise money on their own. And then what happens is those candidates use some of that money to buy materials for national headquarters, like pamphlets, signs, platforms to hand out to people. That’s all–“

Group Calls on Federal Minister Peter Van Loan To Apologize for Lying About Democracy Watch’s Position on Conservatives’ Election Spending Scheme — Files Complaint Calling on Prime Minister Harper To Penalize Van Loan’s Blatant Dishonesty
 
And later the same day, also in response to a question, Mr. Van Loan stated:”Mr. Speaker, let us remember that this was a dispute initiated in the courts by the Conservative Party of Canada because of the unequal treatment of the Conservative Party compared with other parties, including the NDP, which engages in the transfer of funds between riding associations from its central party to assist in local targeted ridings. It has been going on for years. Duff Conacher said that on television. He said it is legal.”

In fact, this is half of what Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch, said on CTV’s Canada AM show on April 16th. He went on to say very clearly that he believes the Conservatives’ scheme violated the Canada Elections Act because the TV ads only contained a small-print message at the end mentioning the local Conservative candidate.
 
Duff Conacher also stated during the same Canada AM interview that he believes the court will rule that the Conservatives’ local candidates can only claim 10-20 percent of the TV ad cost as local campaign spending, and that therefore the Conservative Party will be found to have spent about $900,000 more on its national campaign than the legal election spending limit allowed under the Act.

“Peter Van Loan lied when he claimed that I said the Conservatives’ TV ad spending scheme during the last election was legal — in fact I said very clearly that I believe the scheme was illegal,” said Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch.
 
“Mr. Van Loan owes me and Democracy Watch an apology for so blatantly abusing our good name in trying to excuse the Conservatives’ dangerously undemocratic activities.”

Democracy Watch also sent a letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper calling on him to find Mr. Van Loan guilty of violating the “Ethical Guidelines for Public Office Holders” that require ministers to be honest and are contained in Annex G of “Accountable Government: A Guide for Ministers and Secretaries of State-2007”. Democracy Watch called on Prime Minister Harper to penalize Mr. Van Loan’s blatant dishonesty by removing him from either the position of Government House Leader or Minister of Democratic Reform.

Section V.1. “Ministerial Conduct” of the Guide states:

“Ministers and Secretaries of State must act with honesty and must uphold the highest ethical standards so that public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity and impartiality of government are maintained and enhanced. As public office holders, Ministers and Secretaries of State are subject to the Ethical Guidelines for Public Office Holders and Guidelines for the Political Activities of Public Office Holders, set out in Annexes G and H. Moreover, they have an obligation to perform their official duties and arrange their private affairs in a manner that will bear the closest public scrutiny. This obligation is not fully discharged merely by acting within the law.”

The first guideline in the Annex G Ethical Guidelines is as follows:
 
“Ethical Standards: Public office holders shall act with honesty and uphold the highest ethical standards so that public confidence and trust in the integrity, objectivity and impartiality of the government are conserved and enhanced.”

Prime Minister Harper writes in his “Message to Ministers and Secretaries of State” at the beginning of the Guide:

“I cannot stress enough that implementation of the Federal Accountability Act and associated Action Plan is not simply a matter of compliance. At least as important is our commitment to a culture of accountability in everything we do – that is, to uphold the highest standards of probity and ethical conduct in recognition of the fact that it is a privilege and a trust to participate in the process through which Canadians govern themselves.”
and
“Ministers and Secretaries of State must act with integrity. To ensure public trust and confidence, not only in our Government but in government generally, Ministers and Secretaries of State must uphold the highest standards of honesty and impartiality. Both the performance of your official duties and the arrangement of your private affairs should bear the closest public scrutiny.”

As well, under section V “Standards of Conduct” of the Guide, is the following statement:

“Full accountability to Canadians is a central objective of the government. The Prime Minister holds Ministers and Secretaries of State to the highest standards of conduct for all their actions, including those that are not directly related to their official functions.”

Democracy Watch would have filed its complaint with the federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, but the Conservatives removed the rule requiring Ministers and other public office holders to be honest when they changed their ethics code last July into the new Conflict of Interest Act, and as a result complaints about such blatant dishonesty can no longer be filed with the Commissioner.

“If Prime Minister Harper does nothing to penalize Minister Van Loan for being dishonest, it will be yet another example showing clearly that he believes lying to advance the Conservative Party’s interests is fine with him, and that Cabinet ministers still can’t be held accountable for wrongdoing,” said Conacher.

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsApr2508.html

 

The news media, press

 
I have been working with the News media, press the last 25 years, and for a decade now too I daily write my views to all the major Newspapers, mostly in Canada, and they do next often act upon it as well. I also post my own comments on politics now too.  http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday6  http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/
 
The news media plays a vital role in our society, it tends to be the voice, the conscience of the majority of the people, citizens..
 
Yes I also do even complain about news reporters lies, spins, distortions but fortunately they have their free speech and so do many others too now, me included.. at least most of the time.. I have had the police wrongfully come to my home 6 times in my life time in Canada cause some politician did not like that I had sent him a letter with a copy to the news editors, including a prime minister, premier, mayor now too.. and I am still writing, and most of the bad guys I wrote about are out of office  sooner or later. For the news media tends not to support the losers once exposed even by me.. and no politician can win without the news media support, for advertising is very costly as even Mrs. Clinton or the  PM Stephen Harper knows.

“There’s irony in the notion that the Harper government finds itself under the gun over its election advertising . Political advertising has played a pivotal role in the Conservative party’s rising fortunes, and persists as the party’s preferred means of communicating with the public. But advertising lately has become a headache for the party, being forced to account for its spending on national ads during the 2006 election… the Conservatives won the last election in large part by being paragons of propriety, making accountability legislation a cornerstone of their election platform. The squeaky clean image was designed to contrast with the tarnish on the Liberal brand following the Quebec sponsorship scandal… Stephen Harper has embraced the mantra “playing by the rules.” His party, he asserts, is the one that represents Canadians who play by the rules. Yet here the Conservatives are accused of grabbing unfair advantage through a secretive scheme involving cash transfers between national and local Conservative campaigns… “

“Advertising is important to the Conservatives because they’ve experienced difficulty communicating by other means. The PM has alienated the Ottawa press corps and shied away from both formal news conferences and impromptu scrums. He appears before media mostly in photo ops, with no questions permitted. In addition, journalists, following the 2006 vote, were restricted in their access to the Centre Block area where the cabinet meets and Harper’s ministers often appear muzzled. With advertising, Conservatives have found that they can tightly control scripting and visuals to achieve their communications goals. And, having perfected the art of fundraising under tighter political financing rules, the party has been flush with money to spend on the favoured communications tool.  Conservatives raised four times more money than Liberals in 2007 –about $12 million — which helped them finance a prominent series of ads  Unfortunately for the Conservatives, ensuring such advertising supremacy over the Liberals required the circuitous financial machinations that now threaten the party’s reputation.”

The Tories spins are too late, the damage has been done, again and again.. and fighting with the news media who tend to represent the Citizens firstly is a stupid mistake for any politician, party.

WWJD? Vote for Obama, more and more young evangelicals say Atlanta Journal Constitution,  USA – 18 Apr 2008 They are turning what should be a recipe for conservative confusion into an opportunity for evangelical evaluation.
 
This is a joke, no one should take this serious, I saw on the CTV news today a video of Obama in a bar drinking Beer.. and unlike Catholics, the True professing evangelicals do not consumer alcohol..  so to me he Obama is just another Christian Pretender like the prime Minister of Stephen Harper now too who also consumes, distributes  alcohol and he what still professes to be an evangelical Christian. He cleartly too is not.
 
Known Boozer, ex Prime Minister Paul Martin a professing Catholic also consumes alcohol in abundance  and he too professes to be a Christian now too..
 
Republican White House hopeful John McCain lashed  was pressed on his own endorsement by the Reverend John Hagee, an evangelical pastor who has made outspoken remarks attacking the Roman Catholic Church and who has a definite unbiblical view towards Israel right to the promise land today, Israel’s personal salvation now too. Hagee has a perverted view of the John 3:16 eternal Salvation standards, with One for Christians, Unbelievers  and a different one for the Jews.  McCain said it was “probably” a mistake to solicit Hagee’s endorsement, which might help him with evangelical voters, but said he was “glad” to have it nonetheless.
 
“Just 1.8 percent of evangelicals believe that Jesus Christ would vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008. “http://airamerica.com/blog/2008/mar/30/southern-baptist-conversion-concern-about-climate-change
 
Also Trying to seal the significant loss of public, media  support Canada’s  federal conservatives resorted even lately  to damage control secrecy, spin control instead of being fully honest in the matter.
 
“In a scene out of a second-rate bedroom farce, government operatives skulked around, moving a “secret” briefing for select media outlets from one hotel to another.Most reporters were barred, while a few others, of varying political stripes, were admitted to a closed session. Certainly the topic at hand — allegations that the Tory party outspent its election limit by $1 million — deserves further explanation. The pertinent documents were scheduled to be released Monday anyway. Why would the Harper government go out of its way to further alienate the press corps, in this case including those friendly to Conservatives?”
 
Of course lately this isn’t the first time Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has shown a preference for control, spin doctoring, dictatorship, secrecy and false partiality, RACIAL, ETHNIC and GENDER  BIas too, and next even media favoritism and I have said that was rightfully unacceptable still a long time ago too. Unacceptably the Calgary Christian Missionary Alliance church, a false Christian church as I have detailed why before too, , the preferential Christian denomination  of the professing Christian evangelical  Prime Minister Stephen Harper  wrongfully  does all  that too as I have witnessed first hand many times too is never acceptable, so it is clear why Harper does the same things.

“MP Gilles Duceppe said the Conservatives, Harper  shouldn’t complain about being held to a higher standard” for they had claimed they were going to be more  honest too.

 

 

Bell Sympatico Canada

 
What a really bad unacceptable way for Bell Sympatico now to treat it’s internet customers Still
  
Why does it take months to reply to me on my simple issues too.  I keep on getting transferred also to invalid persons, telephone numbers at Bell Executive care even today.. and no call backs still too Supervisor Mrs Fernandez  RSVP ASAP
  
Bell’s Useless Supervisor Mrs Fernandez of Bell’s useless Sasha Rollins does even needs to be replaced now too . Immediately..
  
From: Paul Kambulow
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: 1-866 317 3382 Bell sympatico care
1-866 317 3382 Bell Sympatico care call me back immediately
 
Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street,  LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home  Tel 514-363-7316  KMM16616921V25471L0KM (KMM16681313V70004L0KM)
PS I have sent you over 150 emails of complaints too, that you have not addressed and also you did  not return my many phone calls..  why?? you only lie when you say that the customer’s concerns, complaints are of interest to you..
 
So I ALSO AM NOW ASKING  1000 dollars, and also rightfully increase a demand from 6 months to one year free unlimited high speed internet services from Bell, if they do continue to trouble me on all of this, my rightfully payment for all of the unacceptable aggravations, and their clear failure still to meet the contract agreement, for Bell they ARE GUILTY OF contract breach definitely.
  
Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street,  LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home  Tel 514-363-7316 KMM16616921V25471L0KM (KMM16681313V70004L0KM)
 
Bad persons, and Politicians, bad corporations  tend to be the same world wide, and the solution the same, full Public exposure and full prosecution of the guilty serves every one’s best interest next too still. For if the evil bad person is not exposed, punished they still  have no reasons to stop doing bad things and doing good things instead. They by the public exposure of their own bad acts they next also do find out that a good name was worth more than all the silver and gold they had hoped to acquire. And many next have as a result too.
 “If you were half as good at running a company as you were at lobbying, maybe you’d have a better network,”  Quebecor executive vice-president Luc Lavoie who took a shot at the quality of Bell Canada’s cellphone service: . http://news.aol.ca/article/telecom-summit/258999/
   
 The future is wireless, some would say  and the  past way they have mismanaged their past land line, ISP services too,  clearly indicates they will do it also next with the wireless services too at the users, customers expenses…
  
Recent discussions by both Bell and Rogers on their Corporate need  to get more and more money, with even any excuse, still out of consumers, and to throttle the downloads,  only all clearly confirms the reality as to how poorly managed these same companies in reality are still.. They too now have been wrongfully over subsidized by the CRTC, the Canadian  federal governments now too… now it is rather time the citizens got the break, protection.
    
Reality- Dirty Dirty Bell Sympatico …the most abusive Corporation, firm I have dealt in Canada in my lifetime. Paul Kambulow
 
 Not acceptable, and Comments are not  needed  FOR THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH..
 
 

 do see also
 http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/to-bell-sympatico/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/unfair/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/bell-internet/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/why-many-businesses-fail/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/buyer-beware-beware/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/crtc-farcical-hearings-on-internet-speed-control/
http://anyonecare.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/bell-bce-sympatico/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/is-your-isp-still-even-watching-you/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/the-war-against-bell/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/bell-throttles-internet-speeds/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/and/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/consumers-affairs/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/bell-lied/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/i-cannot-trust-you-for-you-lie-to-me-all-the-time/
 http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/deceptive-unacceptable-unfair-business-trade-practices-unreliable-internet-access/
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/basic-contract-law/
https://witnessed.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/this-next-was-so-predictable-even-by-me-too/
 http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/action-not-mere-words-needed/

 

 

Bell’s latest response

 

 “If you were half as good at running a company as you were at lobbying, maybe you’d have a better network,”  Quebecor executive vice-president Luc Lavoie who took a shot at the quality of Bell Canada’s cellphone service: . http://news.aol.ca/article/telecom-summit/258999/
   
 The future is wireless, some would say  and the  past way they have mismanaged their past land line, ISP services too,  clearly indicates they will do it also next with the wireless services too at the users, customers expenses…
  
Recent discussions by both Bell and Rogers on their Corporate need  to get more and more money, with even any excuse, still out of consumers, and to throttle the downloads,  only all clearly confirms the reality as to how poorly managed these same companies in reality are still.. They too now have been wrongfully over subsidized by the CRTC, the Canadian  federal governments now too… now it is rather time the citizens got the break, protection.
   
Reality- Dirty Dirty Bell Sympatico …the most abusive Corporation, firm I have dealt in Canada in my lifetime. Paul Kambulow
 
 Not acceptable, and Comments are not  needed  FOR THERE IS NO WAY TO DISPROVE THE TRUTH..

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Hi paul kambulow,It’s been brought to my attention many times that your multiple posts in different thread are disturbing other forum clients with their own issues.

After warning you several times of this and because your continuing doing so I’m now going to close your forum account.

Thank you for your understanding in this matter.

The post of yours are nolonger available for viewing.
 
If you need assistance please contact the system administrator.

 

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Previous Post  |  Next Post 
Posted 8:16 AM by paul kambulow
So this how you Bell still deal with People who complain about Bell’s bad, poor, inadequate services, you deny their right of free speech, basicaly a false excuse as we can all see,
 
Yes, I will post your reply on the net for the whole world to read that Bell doe not want the truth to be known or dealt with.
 
 
 
Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Posted Apr 27, 2008 by paul kambulow
Boy do you still try to over simplify things for others.. and miss the whole big, bad picture. I really suggest you and Bell first do look at my page on Contract law facts in full.

1: Bell for 6 months starting in January 1007 undeniably also had wasted much of my time. Bell had lied to me for 6 months as to the false cause of their slow internet speeds, and Bell blamed it on anything but Bell’s poor, inadequate phone lines, and that was all really unacceptable. Bell here now too was already unacceptably guilty of false and misleading advertising to me about their promised speeds, also about their capacity to deliver their services too , and my whole local community now too. That was the big issue still unresolved adequately by Bell for many others in my community now too. In December 2007 I did not ask Bell for 304 dollars credit I had firstly agreed with Bell for next the 6 months free unlimited download internet next to compensate for the reality that now for many years Bell never firstly supplied me as obligated a high speed internet service because Bell’s EXISTING PHONE LINES COULD NOT HANDLE IT, and Bell had also supplied me still on top of that also a very troubled internet service. Bell next did not honour the spirt, the intent of my agrement with them in December 2007. Now I personally had asked this year for 500 dollars immediate payment rightfully in addition for all the problems Bell next caused me too. I will shortly increase that request to 1000 dollars, and also rightfully increase a demand from 6 months to one year free unlimited high speed internet services from Bell, if they do continue to trouble me on all of this, my rightfully payment for all of the unacceptable aggravations, and their clear failure still to meet the contract agreement, for Bell they ARE GUILTY OF contract breach definitely.

2: Secondly those liars at Bell had lied and had said next in 2008 that I had upgraded my Internet services, but they still cannot prove that ..IRONICALLY THE MENTIONED UPGRADE WAS A MISLEADING TERM, it undeniably WAS A WORSE CONTRACT RATHER FIRSTLY TOO, and why would I be so stupid to do that and to go for 7 megs when Bell firstly could not deliver the reliable, steady continuous 6 megs internet service they had undeniably promised me in July 2007 and next it did even last most of this 2008 year now too.

3: The 55$ for Bell;s unsolicited 2 wire modem. Was this credited to me? How in the world would I know when I cannot access or get a copy of the billing statements for this year from Bell still? and why is that?

4: The Overdraft charges of 75 for Bell’s double-billing twice even in one month were falsely not paid to me yet by Bell. But what else is new Dealing with Bell is clearly a really big trouble for half of the persons too. Bell can only be trusted to lie, and screw things up and Bell does not honour their contract agreement as I have witnessed.Thanks for the interest

Have a nice day
Paul
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/

 

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic
Posted 8:07 AM by paul kambulow
> but as you said you don’t even know if its been credited recently to you.> Aside from being taken for a ride with the line problem for months (which many, including myself can relate to), and them threatening to terminate your services,

>As for your contract law comment, you stated you didn’t accept the new contract, so what contract are you in?

>Why don’t you either just leave Bell and use Quebec Cable for both phone and internet?

>Also Quebec courts are usually very favorable to the small guy. Why not bring up your contract law case there and show the people what can be done? Show the example. It doesn’t cost much to do this.

>Do you think this ‘tech help forum’ can do anything about the contract or the interpretation of the clauses there in? or about Bell falsely changing the contract on their own without your approval knowledge too?

> May I once again suggest that you go to court?

>And Bell…
PLEASE give Paul his Bills over the past 6-months that he asked for. Its bad enough that you (Bell) threatened to end the services of a senior in order to scare him off.

>What’s next?

Speaking, dealing about my new and old contract terms with Bell is ongoing ..

This was a forum to allow Bell first to rectify their inadequacies right on! Tech here had said that my issues were being escalated, looked after too.. so they lie too.. so who is looking after ? what is his name and telephone number?

Public exposure, telling the truth to all how lying, pretentious, inadequate and what Bell is really like, does, is the start of all real justice..

I rightly even here have not agreed with any of Bell’s lies, bad services, bad follow up.. so how anyone can try to say I did is another distorted over simplification.

Paul Kambulow

From: Paul Kambulow
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:34 PM
To: contractsmanager@sympatico.ca
Cc: executive.office@bell.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; Dussault.Madeleine@cb-bc.gc.ca ; marketplace@cbc.ca
Subject: Bell lies about what it does, wants to do still. KMM16616921V25471L0KM, KMM16681313V70004L0KM

Re: The Paul Kambulow Topic http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/action/forums/displaypost?postID=10146497 Previous Post | Next Post
Posted 11:20 PM by paul kambulow
Boy do you still try to over simplify things for others.. and miss the whole big, bad picture. I really suggest you and Bell first do look at my page on Contract law facts in full.
1: Bell for 6 months starting in January 1007 undeniably also had wasted much of my time. Bell had lied to me for 6 months as to the false cause of their slow internet speeds, and Bell blamed it on anything but Bell’s poor, inadequate phone lines, and that was all really unacceptable. Bell here now too was already unacceptably guilty of false and misleading advertising to me about their promised speeds, also about their capacity to deliver their services too , and my whole local community now too. That was the big issue still unresolved adequately by Bell for many others in my community now too. In December 2007 I did not ask Bell for 304 dollars credit I had firstly agreed with Bell for next the 6 months free unlimited download internet next to compensate for the reality that now for many years Bell never firstly supplied me as obligated a high speed internet service because Bell’s EXISTING PHONE LINES COULD NOT HANDLE IT, and Bell had also supplied me still on top of that also a very troubled internet service. Bell next did not honour the sprit, the intent of my agreement with them in December 2007. Now I personally had asked this year for 500 dollars immediate payment rightfully in addition for all the problems Bell next caused me too. I will shortly increase that request to 1000 dollars, and also rightfully increase a demand from 6 months to one year free unlimited high speed internet services from Bell, if they do continue to trouble me on all of this, my rightfully payment for all of the unacceptable aggravations, and their clear failure still to meet the contract agreement, for Bell they ARE GUILTY OF contract breach definitely.

2: Secondly those liars at Bell had lied and had said next in 2008 that I had upgraded my Internet services, but they still cannot prove that ..IRONICALLY THE MENTIONED UPGRADE WAS A MISLEADING TERM, it undeniably WAS A WORSE CONTRACT RATHER FIRSTLY TOO,and why would I be so stupid to do that and to go for 7 megs when Bell firstly could not deliver the reliable, steady continuous 6 megs internet service they had undeniably promised me in July 2007 and next it did even last most of this 2008 year now too.

3: The 55$ for Bell’s unsolicited 2 wire modem. Was this credited to me? How in the world would I know when I cannot access or get a copy of the billing statements for this year from Bell still? and why is that?

4: The Overdraft charges of 75 for Bell’s double-billing twice even in one month were falsely not paid to me yet by Bell. But what else is new Dealing with Bell is clearly a really big trouble for half of the persons too. Bell can only be trusted to lie, and screw things up and Bell does not honour their contract agreement as I have witnessed.

Thanks for the interest

Have a nice day
Paul
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/

Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street, LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home Tel 514-363-7316

Posted 4:46 PM by paul kambulow http://www.supportcommunity.sympatico.ca/pe/forums/displaypost.jsp?postID=10146493&postID=10146493
Nothing has basically changed the last 4 months, or the last 4 weeks on my wrongful and much too many Bell Sympatico problems.
Bell for sure did not yet pay me for the overdraft charges for double-billing me too.

Bell for sure did not yet pay me for the overdraft charges for double-billing me too.

I do not know anything at all really here too for Bell will not talk to me for when I contact them they say that some one from Bell has been appointed from the president’s office to deal with the issues he alone can deal with this, and he too has not talked to me as well next on any of this .. All I still I get useless run around from Bell support, Bell executive care and Bell accounting still on all of this.

My December agreement of free 6 months Internet was credited to me.. But it was illegally transferred from my unlimited account into the new account that I had not authorized, approved, requested, all as usual without my knowledge or permission too.

Bell is an incompetent dictatorship, Unbelievable Even my Bell internet speed was fluctuating, really slow and crappy again this weekend too.

So I wrote today more letters of protest, complaints to Bell and others..

What a bad way for Bell to run their business while the whole world can watch it now too..

Have a nice day
Paul

Paul Kambulow 7781a thibert Street, LaSalle- Montreal, Quebec h8n2c5,
Home Tel 514-363-7316


PS Bell is capping their email too. A letter was posted to my 3 different emails from a Microsoft site and the letter arrives days later on Sympatico email.